Fiscal Year 2006 HUD Budget | ||
| Timeline 2/7/05 - Bush Administration submits FY 2006 Budget Proposal to Congress 7/5/05 - House passes HUD spending bill 7/21/05 - Senate Appropriations Committee passes FY 2006 HUD spending bill Senate Appropriations Committee passes FY 2006 HUD spending bill - On July 21, 2005, the Senate Appropriations Committee passed its version of HUD's funding legislation. Highlights include:
President's Budget Proposal - On February 7, 2005 the Bush Administration sent the Fiscal Year (FY) 2006 budget proposal to Congress. This budget proposal makes deep cuts in domestic spending. The Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) faces some significant funding shortfalls. Overall, funding for the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) would shrink by 11.5%, or $3.7 billion below current levels. Housing for People with Disabilities and the President's FY 2006 HUD Budget Proposal The FY 2006 budget proposes a 50 percent cut in the Section 811 Program, dropping funding down to $120 million from its current level of $240 million. More importantly, the budget proposes to completely eliminate all funding for new unit production in FY 2006 by zeroing out the capital advance/project-based side of the program. This is the 75% of HUD 811 funding that supports capital grants and project-based rental assistance for non-profit disability groups to develop new units of permanent supportive housing. Instead, the President's FY 2006 budget proposes to direct the remaining $120 million in the Section 811 program to renewal of existing rent subsidies (both tenant-based and project-based), with a small amount left to fund new tenant-based subsidies. Specifically, $80 million would be directed to tenant-based renewals, $5 million for project-based renewals (also known as PRACs) and $45 million of new tenant-based contracts. This means that more than 70% of all 811 funds would be consumed by the cost of renewing (i.e. keeping in place) housing funded under the program in previous years. Moreover, the elimination of the capital advance/project-based side of the program would end a 30-year commitment from HUD to support the production of new housing targeted to non-elderly people with severe disabilities (including severe mental illnesses). Reliance solely on tenant-based assistance (portable rent subsidies that rely on voucher recipients being able to find rental housing on their own) also represents a major change in the targeting of 811 away from people with more severe impairments who need housing related supports. By contrast to the 50% cut to the Section 811 program, the budget proposes to level fund 811's "cousin" for the elderly, Section 202 at $741 million. In fact, under the proposed budget Section 202 would actually produce more new units in FY 2006 through the redirection of funds previously allocated to planning grants. Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher Program It is unclear at this point if HUD's Section 8 request for FY 2006 is sufficient to meet the cost of renewing all vouchers under lease. This past month, all housing authorities administering Section 8 were told that their allocation for the current fiscal year would be cut by 4%. As a result, most housing agencies are expected to continue holding back unused vouchers and demanding higher tenant contributions from people in their programs. Thus, HUD will likely be renewing vouchers for a program that continues to shrink. Moreover, the budget notes that HUD intends to come forward with legislation to accelerate conversion of Section 8 funding to a “budget-based” program as opposed to a “unit-based” program. Under a budget-based system, funding to housing agencies is capped at a fixed amount that does not account for increased rents or changes in tenant income. NAMI remains concerned that these changes (including elimination requirements to target vouchers to extremely low-income households) will make it ever more difficult to target assistance to individuals with mental illnesses living on SSI. Homeless Funding |
||
| | ||